A FormBlends network publication

The STEP trials by the numbers: what semaglutide 2.4 mg did in each one

STEP 1 through 10 and STEP UP in one table: who was enrolled, how long, weight change on drug and placebo, the treatment difference with its confidence interval, and the tolerability figure each paper reported, with PubMed ids.

By FormBlends editorial teamUpdated September 4, 2026Educational, not medical advice

STEP (Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with obesity) is the programme that produced the Wegovy label. Each trial answered a narrower question than "does it work". This page gives the primary result of each, as the paper reports it, and nothing the paper does not.

The table

Weight change is the estimated mean percentage change from baseline; "difference" is the estimated treatment difference versus placebo (or versus the comparator where stated) with its 95% confidence interval.

TrialPopulationNWeeksSemaglutide 2.4 mgComparatorDifference (95% CI)PubMed
STEP 1Adults, no diabetes1,96168-14.9%Placebo -2.4%-12.4 (-13.4 to -11.5)33567185
STEP 2Adults, type 2 diabetes1,21068-9.6%Placebo -3.4%-6.2 (-7.3 to -5.2)33667417
STEP 3Adults, intensive behavioural therapy61168-16.0%Placebo -5.7%-10.3 (-12.0 to -8.6)33625476
STEP 4Adults after 20-week run-in on drug80348 (weeks 20 to 68)-7.9%Switched to placebo +6.9%-14.8 (-16.0 to -13.5)33755728
STEP 5Adults, no diabetes304104-15.2%Placebo -2.6%-12.6 (-15.3 to -9.8)36216945
STEP 6East Asia (Japan, South Korea)40168-13.2% (1.7 mg: -9.6%)Placebo -2.1%-11.1 (-12.9 to -9.2)35131037
STEP 7Predominantly East Asian (China and others)37544-12.1%Placebo -3.6%-8.5 (-10.2 to -6.8)38330988
STEP 8Adults, no diabetes, vs liraglutide33868-15.8%Liraglutide 3 mg -6.4% (placebo -1.9%)-9.4 (-12.0 to -6.8)35015037
STEP 9Obesity with knee osteoarthritis40768-13.7%Placebo -3.2%reported as P less than 0.00139476339
STEP 10Obesity with prediabetes20752-13.9%Placebo -2.7%-11.2 (-13.0 to -9.4)39089293
STEP UPAdults, 7.2 mg vs 2.4 mg1,407727.2 mg: -18.7%2.4 mg -15.6%; placebo -3.9%-3.1 (-4.7 to -1.6) vs 2.4 mg40961952

Reading across the rows

Thresholds. In STEP 1, 86.4% of semaglutide participants lost at least 5% of body weight (placebo 31.5%), 69.1% at least 10% (12.0%) and 50.5% at least 15% (4.9%). In STEP 2 the 5% figure was 68.8% versus 28.5%.

Duration. STEP 5 ran two years and landed within a point of STEP 1's 68-week result (15.2% versus 14.9%), which is the evidence that the effect holds while treatment continues. STEP 4 is the mirror image: people who reached 2.4 mg and then switched to placebo regained 6.9% over the next 48 weeks while those who continued lost a further 7.9%. The stopping guide is built on that trial.

Behavioural support. STEP 3 added 30 counselling visits and a low-calorie diet for 8 weeks. Placebo did better (5.7%) and so did semaglutide (16.0%), but the gap between them narrowed slightly compared with STEP 1. Support helps everyone; it does not replace the drug's effect.

Population. STEP 6 and 7 were run in East Asian populations with lower BMI entry criteria and showed slightly smaller percentage losses. STEP 6 is also the only trial with a randomised 1.7 mg arm, useful for the dose comparison. STEP 9 measured knee pain: WOMAC pain score fell 41.7 points versus 27.5. STEP 10 measured glucose: 81% of the semaglutide group reverted to normoglycaemia versus 14%.

Comparator. STEP 8 is the only head-to-head: semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly against liraglutide 3 mg daily, 15.8% versus 6.4%. Discontinuation for any reason was 13.5% versus 27.6%.

Tolerability in the same papers

Gastrointestinal adverse events were the common thread: 63.5% on 2.4 mg in STEP 2 (34.3% placebo), 82.8% in STEP 3 (63.2%), 82.2% in STEP 5 (53.9%), 84.1% in STEP 8 (82.7% on liraglutide), 70.8% on 7.2 mg in STEP UP (61.2% on 2.4 mg, 42.8% placebo). Discontinuation for gastrointestinal events was 4.5% versus 0.8% in STEP 1 and 3.4% versus 0% in STEP 3. The side-effect timeline turns the label's pooled table into per-symptom differences.

What the table does not tell you

Nothing here is about compounded semaglutide, which was in none of these trials. Nothing here is about a dose below 2.4 mg except STEP 6's 1.7 mg arm. And nothing here is a forecast for one person; the weight-loss projection tool on the FormBlends Calculators site applies these means to a body weight with that caveat printed on it. For plain-English digests of each trial's design and limitations, the FormBlends Research site covers STEP alongside SURMOUNT, SELECT and the rest, and FormBlends' own semaglutide research report reviews the programme as a whole.

Questions people ask

Why is the diabetes result so much smaller?

It is a consistent finding across GLP-1 trials. STEP 2 (type 2 diabetes) showed 9.6% loss versus 14.9% in STEP 1 (no diabetes) with the same dose and duration. The papers do not settle why; glucose-lowering co-medication, baseline metabolism and trial population all differ.

Are these the numbers I should expect?

They are population means from people who met trial criteria, attended frequent visits and received lifestyle counselling. Half of people did better and half did worse. Your prescriber's expectation for you should be built from your own response at each step, not from a table.

Canonical URL: https://formblendssemaglutide.com/guides/step-trials-by-the-numbers. Written by the FormBlends editorial team. This page is educational and is not medical advice; see the medical disclaimer.